|
| | [ comments
]

Non-governmental
organizations are going through an extremely difficult period. Spring and summer
of 2003 was especially tough for everybody. Observers say the authorities were
“cleansing” the third sector.
That is the reality. The authorities carried out a huge liquidation campaign,
closing down the civic society structures, which are far from being numerous in
our country. At present courts ruled to close down five organizations. Their
names are widely known to the public: the Ratusha (from Hrodna), the Civic
Initiatives (Homel), the Varuta Regional Development Agency (Baranavichy), the
Kontur Youth Initiatives Center (Vitebsk), and the Youth Christian Social Union.
Now Minsk city court is taking a decision on the Legal Assistance to Public
human rights organization. Hard to believe that courts are unbiased in
evaluating the activity of those NGOs. Obviously, they are just doing what they
are told to. They just dance to the tune, having no courage to reject the
Justice Ministry’s suits. Certainly, it was not the Ministry of Justice
initiating the cleansing. Non-governmental organizations are closed down
simultaneously with liquidation the Belarusian National Lyceum, attack on the
independent press, and introduction of the brand-new course on State Ideology to
all university programs. All those are just elements of a single campaign, which
goal is to extirpate freethinking in Belarus. President Lukashenka has
personally declared the war, calling it “activation of ideological work in the
country”.
Disfavor and animosity of the state authorities towards NGOs is no more a
surprise for anybody. Political scientist Sviatlana Navumava was right to the
point saying, “either friends or enemies” was the main principle of the
state authorities. This principle is a foundation of their relations with
non-governmental organizations. They take NGOs as a source of civic activity,
uncontrolled, thus dangerous. No wonder the regime perceives NGOs as a hostile
element. That is why activists face numerous obstacles in creation of new NGOs;
registered NGOs lose their legal status; the regime floods NGOs with check-ups
and revisions and limits their possibilities to receive financial support from
abroad. The regime has created an extremely unfavorable legislation environment
for development of the non-governmental sector. Belarus is the country with the
most limited freedom of association in the region. An example of somewhat
similar relations between NGOs and authorities could probably be Turkmenistan
– other post-Soviet countries of Central Asia have conditions that are more
favorable for NGOs.
The authorities tighten the ring round the civic society – every time NGOs
risk finding themselves out of the legal field. Presidential Decree # 13 of
April 15, 2003 “On some issues of civic legal proceedings” is the vivid
example. The Decree simply prohibited NGO members to represent citizens in civic
courts. Practically, the Decree works against human rights activists and victims
of human rights violations, making it no more possible to appear for the victims
in courts. Now this right is given only to professional attorneys.
In spring, the authorities decided that nobody but Lukashenka could be called
President in Belarus. All organizations, both commercial and non-governmental,
who had “presidents” as their heads, had to switch to “chairpersons” or
“directors”.
No one is surprised with quite regular statements of international human rights
organizations, which regularly stress flagrant violations of the right to create
and participate in associations. Even UN human rights committee expressed its
concern about persecution of human rights organizations and violation of the
right to association in Belarus in its resolution of April 17, 2003.
Belarus is a member of the United Nations Organization. Belarus has signed the
International Pact on Civic and Political Rights. The Belarusian government must
consider the opinion of the UN Committee. The reaction of the Belarusian
authorities came at once. The Belarusian party immediately replied with
…procedures to liquidate the leading NGOs.
Nobody expected such speed and coordination of their actions in different parts
of the country. Justice Departments of different regions launched liquidation
cases of the influential organizations: the Ratusha (Hrodna), the Civic
Initiatives (Homel), and the Varuta (Baranavichy). Simultaneously the Justice
Ministry started liquidation of Youth Christian Social Union in the Supreme
Court.
The first reaction of civic activists was a shock. After the infamous
“re-registration”, it was the first attack of such a scale. Moreover, the
liquidation suits were based on completely absurd arguments – everyone
realized that any NGO could face such “accusations” any time. However, the
civic society could not get out of the battlefield and watch the reprisal
against their colleagues with apathy. On 29 April, representatives of NGOs that
faced liquidation and the Assembly of NGOs leadership gathered a press
conference. They announced the beginning of Our Solidarity campaign. The
campaign was to work in several fields: on one hand, it was to ensure qualified
legal assistance and civic support for the NGOs, on the other hand, to try to
force the authorities into a constructive dialog with the civic society and make
them to recall the suits.
In the beginning, the campaign activists divided into optimists and skeptics.
The optimists believed it was possible to win the cases in courts and negotiate
with the Justice bodies on normalizing relations between non-governmental and
state sectors. The skeptics argued, biased and dependent courts would never rule
in favor of NGOs. The maximum what the campaign could do was to inform the
society about innocence of the NGOs and political motivation of the cases.
Judging by events, which followed the discussion, the latter were right. At
least, they were closer to reality.
Anyway, soon about two dozen of non-governmental organizations signed a
collective appeal to the Justice Minister. They demanded to recall the
liquidation suits and participate in the public hearings on the issue. The
public hearings took place on May 23. Mikhail Sukhinin, head of Justice
Ministry’s Department on NGOs, spoke at the meeting. According to him,
simultaneous actions against several leading NGOs were just a coincidence. The
meeting was also visited by the Ministry expert Kharyton, mostly known as the
odious specialist on liquidation of organizations.
We should point out some practical sense of the hearings. Although the dialog
between the sectors turned out to be only a formality, the courts suspended the
cases for the period of public hearings. On the other hand, such suspension
might have happened because of the visit of OSCE Parliamentary Assembly
delegation. Probably, the authorities did not want the foreign observers see the
NGO corpses appearing on their eyes. The very way of the cases suspension
manifests a lot. In reply to the Parliament members (even they paid attention to
the problem), vice-Minister of Justice Aleh Krawtsow writes: “Homel, Brest,
and Hrodna courts have suspended the cases due to the instruction of the Justice
Minister”. His words reveal the core of the relations between the courts and
the Minister. The Minister gives an order, and courts immediately execute it.
And one more interesting detail: The vice-Ministers reply had reached the MPs
before the courts signed the decisions to suspend the cases. The courts are
simply ruled by orders of one of the case parties. Does anyone still believe in
independence and impartiality of Belarusian courts?
Public hearings came to end. The OSCE delegation went home. Probably, the
Justice Minister ordered the courts to kill the NGOs. The courts resumed the
procedures. I don’t want to dwell on circumstances of each case here. I just
want to stress one thing. According to the present interpretation of the
legislation, it is possible to close down an organization for a single breach of
law. An NGO with a warning certainly has a sword of Damocles hanging over – it
might get closed down any moment.
Our Solidarity campaign is still going on. Lawyers of the Independent Society of
Legal Research, the Assembly of NGOs, the Viasna lawyers and attorneys took an
active part in the court hearings, trying to prove the innocence of the accused
NGOs. The lawyers have really done everything possible. The courts turned down
most of the claims of the Justice officials. However, the verdict had been made
long before the end of the hearings, -- and the NGOs were closed down. The
courts could do nothing but liquidate the organizations. They just announced the
decision, made neither by them, nor even by the Justice Ministry. Obviously, the
decision to liquidate the NGOs was signed by higher officials.
Officials of the Justice Ministry know better than anybody else, it is
impossible to stop civic activity by court or administrative measures. Ales
Milinkevich, the Ratusha head, and Viktar Karniyenka, head of the Civic
Initiatives announced during the court hearings: “No matter what court
decision would be, organizations will continue their work”.
Our Solidarity activists did a good job in the informational and international
fields. They organized a number of press conferences and met with
representatives of the diplomatic corps, accredited in the country. The names of
Ratusha, Varuta, and Youth Christian Social Union were voiced in the Capitol
Hill. Congressman Christopher Smith mentioned them in his speech. Besides
Belarusian Colleagues, dozens of NGOs from Poland, Norway, Slovakia, Serbia and
Montenegro expressed their solidarity with the NGOs “in disgrace”.
International Helsinki Federation, an umbrella organization for different
European countries addressed the Belarusian government with a protest. In August
the FIDH, influential organization, accredited by the United Nations, addressed
Alexander Lukashenka with an open letter, protesting against persecution of
Belarusian human rights organizations and other NGOs.
However, the pressure on NGOs does not decrease. Having dealt with the Youth
Christian Social Union, the Varuta, and the Civic Initiatives, the authorities
decided to punish the NGOs, which demonstrated solidarity and rendered legal
assistance to them. On 15 July, the Independent Society of Legal Research
received a warning for violation of their Statute by helping out the Ratusha
during their liquidation. The justice bodies give no rest to human rights
organizations, overloading the Human Rights Center "Viasna", the Legal
Initiative and the Belarusian Helsinki Committee with numerous check-ups.
Simultaneously more and more regional organizations are killed out. In July, the
authorities liquidated Youth Initiatives Center Kontur from Vitebsk.
Interestingly enough, the authorities needed only one week to deal with the NGO
– the court worked with a really unprecedented speed that time.
Liquidation procedures against the Legal Assistance to Public were the next
logical step of the authorities. This organization is a good partner of the
Human Rights Center "Viasna", participant of many joint projects. The
head of the Legal Assistance to Public is known for his work of searching for
the missing public figures and helping relatives of the Niamiha stampede
victims. By the way, the authorities could find no other formal reason but
accuse the NGO of …rendering assistance to victims of human rights violations.
Unfortunately, the Legal Assistance to Public wan not the last victim this
summer – for many NGOs liquidation is just the matter of time. Many NGOs are
going through numerous check-ups. This time along “regular” check-ups, the
authorities have invented new ones. In particular, practically all NGOs received
letters from the registration bodies, demanding to provide them with all kinds
of data about membership, organizational structures, legal address, reports of
activities, as well as samples of letterhead and stamp. Most probably, the
information will be used not only for controlling NGOs, but also in preparation
of new liquidation cases.
The mass check-ups have already resulted in a series of warnings to many active
NGOs: besides the Independent Society of Legal Research, warnings were given to
the Belarusian Helsinki Committee, the Belarusian Association of Journalists,
the Belarusian Organization of Working Women, the Lew Sapeha Foundation, the
Union of Poles in Belarus, and the Homel Initiative.
Now all these NGOs are just one step away from the start of liquidation
procedures.
It is no secret who is to come to take the place of the destroyed NGOs. On 30
July 2003 the President signed order # 335 “About National State-Pubic
Associations”. This act actually legalizes pro-governmental public
associations, controlled by the state. Ostensibly, they are to execute the state
decisions in certain spheres. The situation is unique: the authorities
officially encourage creation of GONGO – governmental non-governmental
organizations. The state creates legal conditions for the absolute control over
the society.
We expect creation of a big number of organizations, similar to the infamous
Belarusian National Union of Youth (merger of former pro-Lukashenka Belarusian
Youth Patriotic Union and Belarusian Youth Union). The scheme is worked out. A
GONGO looks like an NGO, independent and voluntary, but in reality it is a
pseudo-NGO, completely controlled by the state, taking no independent decisions,
and serving as an element of the state structures. No doubts (and the Belarusian
National Union of Youth is just another prove for that) membership in such
organizations would not be voluntary. People will be forced into GONGO: women
– into women’s movement, journalists – into Union of Journalists, just as
now all school and university students are forced and even blackmailed to join
the Belarusian National Union of Youth.
The “cleansing” of NGOs makes no surprise in the present context of the
country. NGOs are not the only victims, the authorities use the same approach in
“killing” the independent press. The authorities have declared they intend
to start the vast control over Internet-resources. The course of Belarusian
State Ideology, violently introduced at every state and private university of
the country, is especially designed to dupe and brainwash the youth. The state
does not need educated young people and competed citizens. Only uneducated
people can watch ugly grimaces of dictatorship calmly. That is why the
authorities liquidated the National Humanities Lyceum, a school known not only
for its high level of education but also for independent views of its students
and teachers.
Everything is done for one single purpose – to strengthen the ideological
monopoly. Declaration of the single state ideology started the fight against
freethinking and human rights in Belarus.
Yurka
CHAVUSAW
Coordinator of collective defense system for NGOs

Interdiction (“liquidation”) of non-governmental organisations
The information of system of a collective defense of NGOs
of the Assembly of Democratic NGOs of Belarus
(dated Sept. 9th, 2003)
|
Name and status of the
organisation
|
Location and direction
|
Who and when submitted a suit
to the court
|
An outline of accusations
|
The decision, made by the court
of first instance
|
The person responsible for the
liquidation of the organisation
|
Present state of the case
|
|
National
public association “Youth Christian-Social Union”
|
National
youth organisation
|
11.04.2003
the Ministry of Justice to the Supreme Court
|
Violations at
the Congress of the organisation, at which a number of members of the
United Civil Party joined the organisation. Violations in office work.
Discrepancy of the juridical address. Obstacles during verification by the
Ministry of Justice. Educational activities. Violations during
re-registration in 1999. Violations of the rules of seal production.
|
Liquidated on
09.06.2003
|
The Deputy of the Minister of
Justice Mr. Кraucou. The Expert of the Ministry of Justice Mr.
Haryton. The judge of the
Supreme Court Mrs.Zabara.
|
The decision
about the liquidation acquired its legal validity.
|
|
Horadnia
regional public association “Ratusha”
|
Horadnia,
resource centre
|
On 21.04.2003
the Department of Justice of Horadnia Executive Committee to Horadnia
Voblasc Court
|
The use of
polygraph equipment and publishing activities. The use of non-registered
at that time symbolism of the organisation (2000). Violations of the rules
of seal production.
|
Liquidated on
21.08.2003
|
The Head of
the Department of Justice of Horadnia Voblasc Executive Committee Mr.
Sianjkevich, the Expert of the Department of Justice of Horadnia Voblasc
Executive Committee Mr.Hiljuta, the judge of Horadnia Voblasc Court
Mr.Kalesnik, the judge of Lenindistrict of Horadnia Mrs. Chaleka.
|
The
constitutional complaint was submitted to the Supreme Court
|
|
Public
association “Agency for Regional Development “Varuta”
|
Baranavichy,
resource centre
|
On 22.04.03
the Department of Justice of Bierasce Voblasc Executive Committee to
Bierasce Voblasc Court
|
Activities of
building civil society. Publication of the information bulletin. The use
of a non-correspondent name of the organisation in internal documentation,
distribution of information about the activities of non-registered
organisations, violations of the rules of seal production.
|
Liquidated on
09.07.2003
|
Head of
the Department of Justice of Bierasce Voblasc Executive Committee Mr.
Hocjka. The Expert of the Department of Justice of Bierasce Voblasc
Executive Committee Mr.Dziadkou.
|
The
constitutional complaint was submitted to the Supreme Court
|
|
Homel voblasc
public association “Civil Initiatives”
|
Homel,
resource centre
|
On 30.04.2003
the Department of Justice of Homel Voblasc Executive Committee to Homel
Voblasc Court
|
Violations in
office work, the use of technical equipment received as free foreign
assistance, publication of the information bulletin, organisation of
agitation activities during local elections, violations in acceptance and
exclusion of members of the organisation, creation of structures not
foreseen by the Statute.
|
Liquidated on
17.06.2003
|
The Head of
the Department of Justice of Homel Voblasc Executive Committee Mr.
Makarevich. The Experts of the Department of Justice of Homel Voblasc
Executive Committee Mr.Mickevich, Mrs.Marozava, Mrs.Stryzhneva. The Expert
of the Ministry of Justice Mr.Haryton. The judge of Homel Voblasc Court
Mrs.Krauchanka.
|
The Supreme
Court declined the constitutional complaint. The decision about the
liquidation of the organisation acquired its legal validity.
|
|
Public
association “The Centre of Yoth Initiatives “Kontur”
|
Vitebsk,
youth organisation, resource centre
|
On 02.07.2003
the Department of Justice of Vitebsk Executive Committee to Vitebsk
Voblasc Court
|
The
organisation was located not at its juridical address, it used foreign
financial assistance during President elections in 2001.
.
|
Liquidated on
31.07.2003
|
The Head of
the Department of Justice of Vitebsk
Voblasc Executive Committee Mr. Prannik. The judge of Vitebsk
Voblasc Court Mrs. Matushaicis.
|
There was
submitted a constitutional complaint.
|
|
Public
association “Legal Assistance to the Population”
|
Мiensk,
human rights defence organisation
|
On 07.2003
the Department of Justice of Miensk Executive Committe to Miensk City
Court
|
Representation
of the interests of people, who are not members of the organisation in the
court, legal assistance to citizens, location not at its juridical
address, violations of the rules in office work and the rules of symbols
usage, violations during re-registration in 1999.
|
Liquidated on
08.09.2003 at closed sitting
of the court
|
The Head of
the Department of Justice of Miensk Executive Committee Mr.Zelianko. The Expert of the Department of Justice of Miensk Executive
Committee Mr. Shcharbovich, Experts of the Ministry of Justice Mr.Haryton
and Mrs. Bondar. The judge of Miensk court Mrs.Zhupikava
|
The
organisation is preparing a constitutional complaint.
|
|
National
public association “Women
Response”
|
National
women organisation
|
On 13.08.03
the Ministry of Justice to the Supreme Court
|
Its location
not at its juridical address, absence of the number of members, necessary
for the confirmation of the national level of the organisation, creation
of obstacles for the verification of organisation by the Ministry of
Justice, violations of rules in office work and the usage of the seal.
|
?
|
The Minister
of Justice Mr.Halavanau. Experts of the Ministry of Justice Mr.Haryton and
Mrs. Bondar.
|
The first
sitting in the court is scheduled for the
07.10.2003
|
|
Public
association “Belarusian Found ”Kasijapeja”
|
National
organisation, educational activities in the field of ecology, law, culture
and education.
|
On 21.08.03
the Ministry of Justice to the Supreme Court
|
Co-operation
with a non-registered Assembly of NGOs, participation in the mobilisation
campaign during President elections in 2001, discrepancy of the factual location of the
organisation to the juridical address of the association, violations of
the rules in office work and infringement of the usage of symbolism on the
seal.
|
?
|
The Minister
of Justice Mr.Halavanau. The Experts of the Ministry of Justice Mr.
Haryton, Mrs. Bondar. The judge of the Supreme Court Mr. Samailjuk.
|
The first
sitting in the court is scheduled for the
07.10.2003
|
|
Human Rights
Center "Viasna"
|
National
human rights defence organisation
|
On 21.08.03
the Ministry of Justice to the Supreme Court
|
Is
accused of that protected in court of the citizens,
organized
supervision for elections,
violations
of the rules
in office work, violations during re-registration in 1999.
|
?
|
The Minister
of Justice Mr.Halavanau. The Experts of the Ministry of Justice Mrs.
Fichkina. The judge of the Supreme Court Mr. Kulik
|
Preliminary
sitting in
the court is scheduled for the 23.09.2003
|

MicrosoftWord
The table prepared and supplied by the Info-Department of the Viasna Centre

[
comments
]
| |
Export of democracy
|
|
Full text of the "Democracy Act" presented at the 1st session of the
108th American Congress. |
|
more>>> |
|
|
Library |
|
Culture in the process – the first issue of the legendary Belarusian magazine
pARTisan in the Internet! |
|
more>>> |
|
|
Voices from Belarus
|
|
News from Belarus: liquidation of the civic society structures - an analysis by Yury Chausov from the
"Viasna" Centre. |
|
more>>> |
|
|
Voices from Belarus
 |
|
Before the elections - Vital Silitski about the role of parliament in the Belarusian system of power |
|
more>>> |
|
|
Voices from Belarus
 |
|
Belarus today: Andrey Yekadumau about the "third-hand culture" |
|
more>>> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|